Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Welcome to My Blog

Hello, like it says in the description I started this blog around the fall of 2010, After getting a copy of SVR2010 earlier in the year and playing it for a while and not really enjoying it as much as SVR09, I decided to write THQ a letter and tell them what I thought of it That letter became the very first and probably the most important post
entitled: How they ruined Smackdown VS. Raw
I submitted the letter to the "Product Feedback" section of the THQ website.

After the Letter was submitted I needed a place to store it and share it with others,
along with other things such as my following thoughts about THQ/WWE, their responses
and other people's opinions, I set out to look into various things and talk to more players
and this blog just grew and grew to what it is now.  I know it is alot to read but also
alot of thought and peoples concerns went into it. 
As you read the articles I do hope you find this both enjoyable and informative
all information was correct at the time it was typed/posted and all opinions
are unedited, genuine and honest.
Also please excuse any possible bad grammar. thank you..

Blogger puts things from oldest to newest  but this is the order they should be in:
Part 1:  How they ruined Smackdown VS. Raw
Part 2:  WWE'12: Bigger, Badder, Better...and more Biased?!?
Part 3:  Who's to Blame?
Part 4:  WWE, THQ and the Diva Disaster.. 
Part 5: My thoughts and Feedback on WWE'12 (thus far)
Part 6:  The Failure of the Gender Restrictions in WWE'12

The Failure of the Gender Restrictions in WWE'12

  It took me a while to get this posted because I needed some time to do so but that doesn't mean it is any less important.  Now as you read the title you are probably wondering how do they actually fail?

Well you see they fail being that Male characters can interfere in Diva matches.
 how did this happen?  Well I was playing Universe Mode on WWE'12 and I was
having a 1 on 1 with Natalya. I'm totally dominating the match
then suddenly a cut scene happens and someone comes running down
the ramp! Who is it? none other then EDGE!?! and what does he do?
Well he slides into the ring and punches Natalya in the face
and then punches me in the face and lays us both out flat
then get out of the ring and disappears..
 I get up and continue the match for a couple more minutes
before pinning Natalya.

Now the question is what do I do about Edge?
I can't interfere in one of his matches, I can't
challenge him to a 1 on 1..I don't get any retribution
I don't get any pay back I don't get anything..

How is that even fair? Why do I have to follow
a certain set of rules when the game itself won't even
follow those same rules?

I'm limited in what I can do or am allowed to do
and yet the Game's program can do what ever it wants even break its own rules?
 That doesn't seem at all fair to me and is just another reason why the Gender Restrictions
should be removed.

Monday, February 6, 2012

My thoughts and Feedback On WWE'12 (thus far)

This is my WWE'12 feedback, true to what I said I didn't purchase WWE'12
but I did receive a copy of the peoples edition sent to me for free
it arrived in the mail on Dec 15  so this is basically ever thing
from Dec 15 2011 to Jan 29th 2012.  Some of these things might
have been fixed with the "Fix everything patch"  but I doubt it.
many aspects of the game are covered from Create mode, Universe,
Online, etc.  also be aware that being that I am a girl gamer
most of this is from a "Diva perspective" unless I'm talking
about Road to Wrestlemaina or something like that.
(I do not mention all the things I liked just ones that stood out)

I did like the opening movie, I think it has been a
long time since there was an opening movie to the
games.

 When creating a character nothing is very different it all
looks pretty much the same as it did in 2011 I just basically
copied everything from SVR11 into 12.  there wasn't really
anything new and exciting, where is the new? 

the actual create a character is pretty much
identical. though you do need to bring back the color wheel
for skin tone/color  the bars where you pick one is still
horrible. we need the sliders so we can adjust the right
skin tone.

Now probably the single greatest thing in the
game is the ring announcer thing were you can
string together words to make something good
and doesn't sound stupid no longer am I "the Superstar"
but I actually have "Sexy Girl" back  well its more like
"Sexy...Girl" but that is not a complaint its better then
"the Superstar"  also when I come out dressed nicely
(as in non ring gear clothes)  it announces me as
"Ms.Jones"  which made me just as happy.

But this only go so far as for commentary you have to
pick a completely different name off a completely different
list?  so in the commentary I once again have to be ""the Superstar"
again.. Why have two different lists? why not for commentary
just pick one thing off the announcer list for your commentary
name?  if I could do that I would have picked Jones for my
commentary name.

Also The crowd doesn't chant the right name at times
I was playing with a friend offline and their
commentary name was "the Monster" but the
crowd was chanting "Nightmare"

As for the "Home town" thing it is good to have some wacky
places like Mount Olympus, The Distant Future, From under your bed
but you should stick to real places. for example there are more
Canadian provinces then Ontario, Quebec,Alberta, etc
what about the people from New Brunswick? or PEI? I'm from Nova Scotia
so it would have been great to have Nova Scotia, Canada.
you have all 50 states and each state opens up to a list of
cities in that state. all I want is one province.

Most of the idiocy of the level cap is gone which is good but still
there are some things that are still held back  my striking strength
is at 75 I think and my grapple is at 80?  but the majority of my other stats
I was allowed to max out. 

While cycling through the Taunts in Create a move set I noticed
there there were more expressive face and hand animations which
was pretty good.

While in Create a move set  I have the ability to set moves for the
Royal Rumble.. Why is that even in there it is superfluous
being that I can't use my character in the Royal Rumble because
of the retardedness of the Gender Restrictions. 

Speaking of which the game once again fails as a whole because
of that one thing.. And will continue to fail because of that one
thing.  Take for example the recent Royal Rumble (Jan 29th 2012)
Kharma is the 3rd woman to enter the Rumble and it is only a
matter of time before she done tossing around Kelly Kelly and
Eve before they start putting her in matches with the men.
so THQ or its representatives can no longer hide behind
"We have to follow what happens on WWE TV" 
or hide behind saying they have to have the Gender Restrictions
in there because it is a "Teen Rated" game. 
We all know the rating doesn't matter people of all ages are
going to play it no matter what also The game series has been
around since 1999 and all the games all of them were rated
T for Teen and there was worse things in them in the past
everyone seems to forget the "Spank Meter" and the
spanking move you could add to your move set.
and under the rating on the front cover of the case
it states "Online interaction Not Rated by the ESRB"
I told THQ and Marcus Stephenson exactly how to fix
the Gender Restrictions in a way that does not compromise anything.

There was another thing that I thought was the result of
Gender Restrictions my very first match online (12/20/2011) was a
with manager match a friend of mine what me to manage them
and I went to pick my character and couldn't I couldn't seem to pick
any female characters.. and I was furious but the next time
I tried (1/24/2012) I could do it.

Also I am reminded of this quote Brian Williams
"Were doing this for you guys, and we want to give
you your money's worth"
Us diva players and fans are not getting our money's
worth out of the game. Were paying 60+ for a game that
you can at the moment play only 40-45% of as a female character
and then another $11 for Fan Access or a dollar per Diva
to get a roster of people to fight. 
where there is 40+ Superstars that could could
face off with but can't. 
The Gender Restrictions don't help they only hinder
I still believe there should not be a special set of
rules governing one side and not the other, there should be
no limitations placed on one side and not the other.

Women should be allow to compete in every match type
ladder, extreme, Hell in a Cell or 6 Man person tag,
elimination chamber, ect. anything and everything!
speaking of which Why can't I do a 6 person mixed tag?
you do one in the first part of Road to Wrestlemaina
Layla is taking part in a match with 2 of the "United Kingdom"
Members. But as always I'm intrested to hear any new excuse
for the The Gender Restrictions.

As for DLC I wish you could edit the entrances
in advanced creator and pick them apart and change them
around like you can with the characters that come on the
disk. 
also the majority of the DLC is lost on me
Why would I download Macho Man or Batista?
I'm not going to play as them and I can't
fight them.. so it would be a waist for me
to even get them, if I could fight them sure
I would have happy downloaded them but I can't.

What the point of "custom" Entrance video?
sure that is a cool idea where it makes an
actual entrance video but you have so very little
control over what is created.. it just makes some
random video based on a template I have no actual say
in what goes into the video.. how do I edit my entrance
video? What if i want to put a part at the end at the beginning?
or what if I want to put a part from the middle at the end?
I thought this was suppose to be Custom?
with entrance video you should be able to import it into
the editor where you make highlight reels so you can edit it
and save it so you can use it online.

Also what it the point of create an arena?
I know people wanted that for years and years
and it is a cool feature but I think stuff like that is
a bit useless in the long run because you can only use
it offline. you can spend a couple of hours making this
thing and making it great but in the end it just
kind of a waist of time.  Its like create a sign.
create a sign was an excellent idea  but you can't
use any of your signs online.  Now I know you want
to protect all the lil kids from swear words and
awkwardly drawn pixellated boobs someone made in
paint tool.  But at the same time it kind of
defeats the purpose of actually having the feature
if you can't use it to its fullest.

In Create an Entrance Where you add things like
pyro and the name plate on the stage/ramp
I always thought you should have better control
over that like the timeline there
with some better controls.  maybe the ability to pause
it and use the sticks to rewind/fast forward
and maybe have L2 or R2 as step buttons where you
click them  and it goes through the animation
one frame at a time so you can place your
name plate/pyro at just the right time
also there should be some type of Undo button
that will erase it if your timing is off or want
change it which would be good.

Mini Trons..everyone was talking about
wanting Mini Trons.  I thought they
were suppose to be a selectable thing?
like entrance videos.  Were you could
pick them from a list where you could have
a set of fire ones or electricity or rotating
chains?  what happened to that?
I didn't see the ability to select anything
like that when creating my entrance.
create an entrance is pretty much the same
as it was last year.

On the name plates it says
"WWEDivas.com"  why can't I remove
that? I don't want that on there I
should be allowed to remove it. 
or at least replace it with something
of my own.

As for paint tool Which don't use very much
but needed to make a few things this year
now I had a big problem with the placement of
my created Logo/Designs.  It took me a week
to actually get it to stay where I put it.
For example I would put something on the stomach
or chest and save it then come back to edit it
and the logo would be down on the characters leg
or back or somewhere else. I don't know what happened
in the end I finally gotten it to stay in one place
but I just had to keep moving it back and moving it
back until it actually stayed there.

Why is it in paint tool that the lettering color is
preset?  if I put a Letter on there it is preset to
black and to change it I would have to edit it with
one of the other tools in paint. that is some
unnecessary steps whatever color I have selected
should automatically be the color of the text
I want to use.  If I have Red selected on the
color pallet then my text should automatically
be Red. 

While playing offline I seem to have been having
some problems with things like collision detection
here and there where my strikes didn't at times
seem to connect there was a few times were I was
in front of an opponent and take a few swings and
it was like hitting nothing and then they would just
grapple me.

also speaking of things that are "hit and miss"
the running strikes and grapples success rate
seems to be some what low as well where I would
try to do one and the opp would side step then I
would get up and try to do one again and for some
reason I wouldn't even get close and would for
some reason fall short and then try for a 3rd time
and just get side stepped again.
Now you might be thinking by that description I'm try to spam
the thing, but no this is during a regular match
with strikes,grapples,reversals I would try to use them
when an opportunity came up.  Also the Game controlled opp
seemed to be spamming me with their successful running
strikes and grapples.
There were also times where I would try to do one
and my character would go in the opposite direction
or go for the opp and then go off in a different
direction.

As for the controls I don't think I really consider
them simple and easy.  It might be because you are
use to playing things a certain way for a few years
and it takes time to get use to a new way of doing
things.  I remember being told that you could
switch between the NEW 12 controls and the previous
SVR 11 control system, If that was actually planed
what happened to it?
Have you ever thought about custom controls? 
a lot of games offer you the ability to change the
controls to how you want them. 

I thought Simply pressing L1 during a regular tag
match was a good idea.

I don't really like the Grapple and Submission button
both being X.  I know you could probably just tap it
for Grapple and Press for Submission, but there are times
when your in a fast paced match and you what to do a
grapple then press and you get a submission. I don't know
I just don't think it shouldn't be the same button
I don't have a problem with the submission system
as of yet it seems to be actually good its just the button
mapping that frustrates me.

Also speaking of things that are utterly frustrating

1. The kick out system:  why in the hell did you make it
like this?!?  where you have to hold in the button
and have to go to that lil blue line? 
holding in the button is a horrible thing because 95%
of the time it doesn't work!!!
I was doing pretty good with the button mashing kick out
that actually worked, you actually had a chance of kicking out!
the "Hold in the button, and hit the tiny line"  one
does not work!!!
I would be holding it in and it would go right passed it
and I would be doing this until the 3 count and I would loose
I was even using at times resiliency to make this line bigger
and it would go right passed it and I wasn't kicking out.
I was playing with a friend of mine and they pinned me
and I was holding in the button and it was hitting the
blue line and on the blue line many times and I
still didn't kick out.   

2. The reversal system is of course with out a doubt
complete and absolute garbage!  it has been for
the last couple of years. it seems it started with
the introduction of the One button reversal system
Now I know there was one before then you switched
to the 2 button and then back to the one.
Now here is how I see it:

SVR09- I would say I possibly had a 75% chance
of doing a successful reversal. 

SVR10- this was horrible I would have to say
I might have had a 45% chance of a reversal.

SVR11- Actually seemed workable and I would say
that there was actually a 50% chance of a reversal

WWE'12- is horrid..even more so then SVR10
I would say there is about a 35-40% chance
that I'll reverse anything.

I don't know what is going on with this
you could say that I'm not timing it right
or something like that but I can honestly
say that I am clicking the button when the
button needs to be clicked and nothing happens.

In the few online matches I was actually
able to have while trying to play online
(the keyword is trying) it like you
just get steamrolled. I'm click for a
reversal nothing happens, I could go
a whole match and not seem to be able
to do one reversal. 

I don't know what to say I'm
trying to play my best but with
the way the kick out and reversal
systems are I look like a total jobber.

I didn't do much with story creator
it looks all pretty much the same
with nothing really new. although
it does look like you can write
in more in the text boxes which is good.

As for ring escape, why did you put a
limit on it?? that is just stupid you can only get
out 3 times? what is the point of having it if you
can only use it a few times?  you should by now know
don't put limits on stuff. If I want to use ring escape
I should be allowed to use it as much or as little as
I want to. 
You want this to be "realistic" right? do people in the
WWE have a limit on how many times they can roll in and
out of a ring? I mean are they told "you can't do that
more then X amount of times"

One thing I'm curious about is the Smackdown Theme
why is it different then the one on TV? 
is it because Know Your Enemy by Green Day is a
horrible song and whoever picked that should be fired
and the one on the game is way better
is that why they are different or is it something
else?

During one singles match I was practically halfway
under the ropes when I was pinned and I did not receive
a robe break and yes I always play with rope break on.


You should have had a way to turn off the
"Whats Hot" scroll at the bottom of the main
menu. Like how you could turn off
Universe in 2011, I don't really need that
scrolling down there I find it a bit
distracting. 

I don't know about anyone else
but you should have probably kept
the "Training area" to help people
get accustomed to the new button scheme
that might have went over well
with people trying to get use to
the new set up

A quick word on the switch to
"Online Manuals"  sure you might consider
that convenient in some way and it might
make you feel better about going green
or whatever. I for one would have possibly
would have liked to have gotten an
actual booklet if it is all the same to you
unlike most people my manuals
don't get worn,torn or lost because I do
this radical thing that many might not have
thought of which is I keep them in the game case
until I need them..
for a quick look up of something during
the loading screen or while the entrances
run I would usually grab it. 

Having to turn on the computer, waiting for it to boot up,
open Web Browser, type in address, select the game
from a pull down list  and then find what I need
on the web page  is of course more quicker and easier
then reaching across the couch, grabbing the case
taking the manual out and flipping a few pages?
but after all what do I know right?

another thing that happened in this game as well as the last
couple is an odd glitch where someone come out to interfere
in my match then the camera angle changes and some how
they never make it to the ring they seem to get lost is the
black hole between the ramp and the ring. 

Also another problem with Universe is what I call
the "Day Dreaming ref" there was a few times durring a
few matches were I thought the ref forgot that he was at
work because when I went for a pin he would just stand there
like he is off somewhere else or thinking about that he
should do. 

Why can't you interfere in title matches in Universe
I would want to get payback on that person who interfered
in my match previously but they are protected in
"title match"  you should be allowed to interfere in any match.

I did like when you "create a show" you can change the
background on the VS. screen.


While playing a match in Universe I left the
ring using ring escape and by doing so lost
all sound except for the crowd cheering.
I didn't get the sound back until I re entered the
ring.

there were also a few little stalls and glitches in Universe
but the main thing that bugged me was the flow of it.
where everything flowed together.  I only want to do
the matches I'm involved in I don't want to do the whole
card of every show.  When I started playing universe I
did my first match and I won that match and it seemed
like I was pushed right into the next match on the
card and I was thinking "wtf? I don't care about
kofi VS. daniel bryan" so I had to quit that
and leave Universe and re enter it.
and that went on a few times I don't care
about Triple H vs. Mark Henry or Shamus Vs. John Cena
and so on.. I was beginning to think that you couldn't
pick and choose matches to do in Universe you could
only pick a starting point and do that match card then
you'll go back to the card.  It wasn't until I did this
a few times when I noticed near the end of the
Win animation that some controls pop up that will
take me back to the match Card but you seem to have
to be quick in making your choice if your not quick
you'll be pushed into the next match. 
I was thinking why didn't I notice this before?
and my answer was given to me a couple of matches
later when this control options thing didn't appear
and I was pushed into a match with the Big Show.
After Winning a match in Universe the game should
pause and give you clearly visible options.
such as press this to continue to the next match
or press this to go back to the match card.
I know you want to keep the thing moving
but not everyone wants to do every match
in Universe.

Now as for Road to Wrestlemania  I did like how it started
it was very nice visually.  RTWM does have that authentic
TV feel to it, complete with the PPV intros where it say
"And now WWE Presents.."   that was pretty good.
also RTWM has the exact thing I was mentioning above
where it pauses and gives to a button prompt (X being I'm on PS)
at things like the VS screen.  I want to continue when I want to
not be pushed along.  

I also like the cut scenes it lends it to the TV authenticity
and find that it actually keeps things moving  none of this
random running around backstage which was rather boring,
repetive and overly time consuming. 

Also the Commentary in RTWM seems to be lot better
then it is on the rest of the game.

Also I do like how the lil objective window stays on screen
so you don't forget what you have to do during the match.
although there was a few times where I didn't get an
objective window and I ended up getting a DQ when I didn't even
do anything that would be considered DQ worthy  and received
a "Objective Failed"  message. I couldn't complete the objective
if I don't know what it is. 
I redid the match and did the same as before and passed it
so I don't know why I'm failing objectives when I'm not given any.

I didn't finish Road to Wrestlemaina so that is all i have for that


Now as for online where do I start..?

I probably don't need to mention the constant Server unavailability

so I'll start with the Online menus were somewhat confusing where you
had to hit L1-R1 I don't know why it was confusing probably because
I was use to clicking an option and given a list of more options.
but you have to click the shoulder buttons now so I guess that is
ok.

One of my main problems which is related to the server
unavailability is that I create a match and I wait and wait
people join and people leave I could be waiting up to say
45 mins and then some guys join the match and start to
moan and groan about how it is a Divas match and then go
on to berate me for doing/creating a Divas match.
I tell them if you don't like it then leave, but it
doesn't matter what I say and Now true I could quit
the match and recreate but 1. I don't want to wait another 45mins
and chances are I'll get the same people back in here
and 2. I just want to play, have a good match and have fun.
If I didn't have to suffer the idiocy of the
Gender Restrictions I wouldn't have to
wait for people to join I never waited on 09
and if I didn't have the idiocy of the
Gender Restrictions people wouldn't be complaining
like they do.  But your probably wondering what
does this have to do with the Server?  Well after
waiting all that time and listening to all that chauvinistic
douchebaggery the match begins to start and its counting
down and just before it gets to 1  bang Server Unavailable..
that ladies and gentlemen sums up 90% of my online experience
on WWE'12. 

during one of the online matches
I was actually able to play with out any
server problems resulted in a DQ 
why is that important?  it was a TLC match.
you can't get DQed in a TLC match.
it was a Diva tornado tag TLC Match
things were going great until one of the opponents
got out and got a chair when they hit me with
the chair  the match resulted in a DQ.

Another time I was kicked from my own match due
to server unavailable and was sent back to the main
Online menu. I then went back to the match list and
my match was visible on the list so I tried to join it
upon trying to do that I was kicked offline and sent
right back to the main game menu.

I haven't been able to do much online due to every
time I try to do something I get Server Unavailable.

the very few times I even attempted to enter
community creations I was bumped out due to
Server Unavailability. there were a couple of times
when I actually made it on and when I tried to leave
on two separate occasions it froze up my PS3 and
I had to restart.

Now that is pretty much it..
I did want to mention a few thing though
such as what happened with the patch and the
removal of the so called "Bra Glitch" 
from what I understand it was removed because it
was "inappropriate"  or something along those lines
seriously?  I mean come on seriously? 
and I know you will push the blame off to
WWE and say things like "were a licensed product
and have to do what they tell us" and all that
but then if that is the case you can't have
your company (THQ) and its representatives
out there popin off lines such as

"We want you to play how you want to play
opposed to how we're forcing you to play"

"We want you to be happy about the game"

"Were doing this for you guys, and we want to
give you your money's worth"

(those were direct quotes from your WWE ‘12
 game designer Bryan Williams)

and yet people found away to create unique
attires and outfits. Tops, pants, shorts
you name it. People have a sense of pride and
uniqueness about their character and they actually
have fashion shows on the game where everyone
can show off their designs and styles and people are
having fun and enjoying themselves and you (THQ)
comes in and puts a stop to all that and then you
sit and wonder why the fans are mad at you?
In my opinion you are basically Shooting yourself
in the foot and you have been constantly doing it in the
last couple of years.  And the fans the true fans especially
the Diva ones are not going to stand for it.
You Drove people way with the Gender Restrictions
you created a backlash when you removed a whole bunch of stuff
like moves in SVR2010 and there was a whole host of problems
with SVR11 true it was better then 10 but still certain things
would have made it way more enjoyable. 
Now personally I think come WWE'13 you are going to have
had pushed away more players and profits are going to fall
and pretty soon all the originality and creativeness that
once was the back bone of this series will be gone and
all you'll be left with is the WWE Marks buying this series
and telling you how much of an awesome job your doing


Do I truly think it is Bigger,Badder and Better?
of course not! true it might be slightly larger
in scope were there are a few more things to do
but a lot of it is like I said "What the point?"
if you never play online then its great I guess...

The games (and the WWE) use to mean something
it use to give the middle finger to the warmed over
politically correct bullshit and use to have teeth
and balls and not be afraid of stepping on toes or
saying the wrong thing.   

Now a days especially when it comes to the games they
are built on lies, hypocrisy, BS and
and filled with sanctimonious self righteous morality
and unnecessary censorship.  It is like the game series
was handed over to the likes of Steven Richards and the
faction Right to Censor (RTC)

Personally as far as the games go I would personally
rather play SVR09 then 10-12 combined
why would I rather play a 3 year old game rather
then the newest thing? because I like to have fun and
actually play my way.  If 09 supported Divas being able to
all the matches they can now the game would have been the
best and I already think that 09 is the height of
awesomeness it peaked with that and is now going down hill

also Marcus Stephenson you told me
personally
"keep thinking that we're against you."
True Divas are allowed to do more now 
Tables matches, cage matches, TLC, etc
and I do enjoy all that but yet I don't believe
you have yet proven that you aren't against us.  

In the end..I don't think it is what was promised
I don't think it is a brave new beginning
Sadly if this is truly the future of the franchise
then I might have to leave, its a future I don't
want to be a part of. Sure it is a reboot or a retooling
whatever you want to call it.  but in my opinion
its more "Batman & Robin" then "Batman Begins" 

Also I don't know how you managed to get this
named as a Game of the Year?
the cheque involved must have had a lot of zeros on it...
because for me to indorse this as a game of the year
of any year in fact I would have to have a cheque handed
to me with more zeros then I have fingers.
and if it was voted in everyone who voted this
a game of the year deserves a swift super kick to the head.

but that is all for now.

Thursday, September 1, 2011

WWE, THQ and the Diva Disaster..

I wanted to post some more thought from others about
the lack of female support in the games  with quotes
from others as well as maybe a few more thought
from myself.

 A female Fan had this to say below: 

"The WWE wrestling game, be it SVR or the latest WWE'12, is the only
legitimate option we have in the United States in terms of a mainstream,
across-all-consoles, wrestling game. We do not have the luxury of having other
options, and the times we did, the "competition" (being TNA Impact and
Lucha Libre AAA:  Heroes del Ring) wasn't much of a competition in terms of
female/women's/diva wrestling. By default, wrestling games tend to ignore their
women's divisions of the respective company they're representing, and I'm very
grateful for the developers of current and past WWE games to allow themselves to
put their time and development into the "Divas" division of their wrestling games.
Though I will say that if "WWE All Stars" actually had divas in the game, I would
have probably purchased it by now, instead of currently waiting for that assumed price drop.

Restrictions personally do not bother me to much, and while I am a fan of inter-gender
match-ups, not having the option to face opponents of the opposite gender isn't necessarily
a deal-breaker for me, but I as a player do understand the importance of having this option
in the game. Now for me personally I have to say I care more for the creation aspects of an SVR/WWE game, more so than the actual game-play elements. New submission system? Cool. New grapple-breaking engine? Awesome. Bringing back camera angle/action shots in simulated CPU vs CPU matches? Please, I beg of you. I would personally love a better CAW/CAS mode for female wrestlers. Not being able to connect a straight line design from the chest area to the back area is aggravating, especially when trying to create bra-straps for a top. Not being able to wrap a design around the upper torso, and keeping it straight is also very aggravating (it tends to curve when wrapping onto the back, making it odd to create a top.) Would love more female hair options, a better selection of bra types, and a revamped face/body morphing selection.

While difficult to have/find a diva match online, it always has been, even before the restrictions were put into place. I would often have diva vs superstar matches online in SVR08, and hardly diva vs diva, since the majority of people playing the game do not necessarily give female wrestlers the same respect as male wrestlers. Sames goes for pretty much anything wrestling related, honestly. But as stated previously, SVR/WWE is our only option when it comes to female/diva/women's wrestling in a mainstream wrestling game, and while I understand the concerns of "beating up women," and the morals it may implement, people do have to understand that inter-gender match-ups aren't as "taboo" as they believe they are. They happen in the independent scene, the Japanese wrestling scene, pretty much everywhere but current-day WWE and TNA. In the past, inter-gender attacks in the WWE helped convey an emotional connection to the audience. Trish Stratus for instance, has often taken bumps from male wrestlers, even getting hit by finishing maneuvers. By doing so, it made the audience hate whomever did the maneuver, even despise them, which in turn made them care for the status of Trish Stratus for taking that bump, maybe even getting the respect of the audience. There was also an angle between Stacy Keibler, Test, and Scott Steiner, which resulted in Stacy taking bumps. Lita has also taken many bumps from male wrestlers, and even has done moves against male wrestlers. In my honest opinion, these inter-gender attacks helped make the audience care for the divas, even holding them on a higher pedestal than current-day WWE divas. Lita gets a lot of respect from the WWE audience, despite not being that technical of a wrestler. Trish gets a lot of respect from the WWE audience, when Natalya is a better wrestler than she is, and probably ever will be, again that's just my opinion.

Most recently, I had to make a female referee in CAW/CAS mode, because the referee in the game is recognized as "male superstar," and in order to convey the final scene in my CAW-Show, I needed a referee. If you could fix this in future games, where not-actual-wrestling talent, like a nameless referee isn't tagged as a certain gender in-game, it would make it a lot easier to create scenes in Story Designer using female wrestlers."
----------

I personally do agree with this players post, I personally do respect people
like Lita and Trish way more then the Bella twins or god forbid someone like
Layla.  Take me for example compared to someone like Layla I'm Andre the giant. 
she is like what? 5'2"- 5'3" where I'm 6'0" I'm fit and athletic, I'm interested in Kick boxing and have done some (not professionally) I do stuff from a position of strength and power, I love submissions and I'm a fighter. and I put this all into my CAW/CAS becasue its biased off me personally. and if I were to become a WWE Diva from what I can see the only threat to me would probably be Beth Phoenix.
I'm not going to sweat the small stuff (Layla lol) so for actual competition I want to fight the men I want to fight Undertaker and HHH on the game not EvE and Kelly Kelly. 

 Lets take Tough Enough for a good example the only reason I watched
the new series with Stone Cold  was 1. There was women doing it
in the ring with the men fighting it out.  2. because Trish on it. 
it goes back to that respect, I respect Trish as a competitor.

 I'm not a "Diva" and don't like referring to myself as one
because I am a fighter, I am a Wrestler and I am a Female Competitor!
people treat Wrestling like its bad,  No truer words have been
spoken then the ones in the videos below:

Tara:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBGJprmrXI4
Hogan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBkKPfh9FMQ

(I know using TNA videos in a WWE Argument  but they make my point)
I agree with what they say I'm all about putting fist to face
and foot to ass! and the way that SVR & soon to be WWE12 are going
I'm hindered in doing what I love. 

  Also as we go back to the respect angle  yes it is alot about that
as a female player, when I fist started playing online It wasn't
easy, it was brimming with hate from the Male players  becasue
I was female and in the first few months I had to play harder,
faster and smarter then my male counterparts  to earn their
respect.  I fought top players on the PSN and won earning
their respect and was even invited to join groups
becasue they valued my skill, strength and aggression.

 But that all seem like a waist now, due to the idiocity and
assholery of The Gender Restrictions.

---

 Another players comments about how WWE has ruined the
female division by running it into the ground  and
also about the awesomeness of Games that Gender Restrictions
FREE as well as how Amazing inter-gender tag teams and play can be:


"The main problem is that WWE doesn't give them the time to shine, nor the
storylines/feuds so they can shine as much as previous women in early years.

So they mostly end up running up to the ring, rush through 2-3 moves and clear the ring so the audience can watch the same old advertisements of what happened between superstars in a other show for like 10 minutes, then a Michael Cole or other stupid segment get shoved down their throats additionally to other things.

Also, games, like No Mercy and Fire Pro Wrestling allows women and men to go for any title, including tagging together for the Tag Team Championship.  In the wrestling world outside WWE, there are men and women tagging together to win whatever tag team championships are available. Some promotions even went as far as to create inter-gender tag team championships just for the cause.  Just look for a Sara del Rey & Chris Hero match and you'll see just how good it can be."

---
 I totally agree with what this person says, about the WWE and The games
and more especially the games.  Like I said in the original post
(How they ruined Smackdow VS Raw)  my guy and I were an amazing team
offline when playing with friends on SVR09 or previous.. The same goes with
online and my online male friends when I tagged with one of them we totally rocked!!

 But ever since the introduction of the Gender Restrictions in SVR10
this has stopped I hardly play with any male friends anymore and that
hurts me greatly!!  and who did this? WWE did!! they took this away
from me and away from all the other female players who enjoyed playing
with the Guys in there life.  

 WWE doesn't care about the female fans and I don't believe THQ
does either.  In the WWE 12 - Gameplay Q&A #5 (below)
That ass Cory Ledesma says at the slider position of 5:15

"If its not broke don't fix it!" 

 Well you are fixing stuff that wasn't broken to begin with!
becasue you seem to be doing a good job of "Fixing" the Divas

and then he goes on to say at 5:25:

"We want to make sure were not stripping away features the fans
really like and make sure the best parts of the game are still in"

Yeah..sure.. you don't want to strip away stuff unless its Diva
related  right Cory?

and then finally around 7:26 - 7:34 on the slider he says

"We fight for the community and get the features they want in it"   

Which I and many people believe that is a load of BULLSHIT!
You don't fight for me..?  I'm fighting for myself as well
as all the other female players that lost features that
they loved and enjoyed.  Or is it that you only fight
male players?  or the people who totally kiss your
and THQ collective ass?

Now alot of Male plays constantly tell me
"Mixed Tags are good enough for the Divas they don't
need anything else"

Now the people who say that clearly never did
a Mix Tag match and if they did they are having a
completely different experience then I am..

A friend of mine and I have had well over 100 Mix Tag matches.  every match is a maximum of 3mins or less (this is not including entrances this is actual in match time bell has rung match has begun) why 3mins?  simple!  The Gender Restrictions!!!
either I get hit or the opposing Diva feels the need to jump in and get hit on purpose.
true sometimes there are accidents but mostly not.  out of the over hundred matches my friend and I probably only played 4 where there was no shenanigans and out of those 4 full matches we won 2.  we should get a PSN trophy for the most matches in the shortest amount of time.

at times the opposing Superstar has run from the up left corner in a stright line stright passed my Superstar partner and speared me off the apron. Trigering the match to end due
to DQ as per the "rules" set forth by the Gender Restrictions.
Yes that was an actual match I was in....

There have been times when the opposing Superstar had my Male partner on the other side of the ring and would leave him on the mat and claimly walk across the ring and punch me.  triggering the DQ.  WTF?!?  can I do anything about this?  No I have to make a whole new match!!!

That Ridiculousness wouldn't fly on SVR09 and if I had the ability to turn off the DQ on SVR11 in Mix Tags after he would hit me I would get up get in the ring and kick his ass! 
and if his female partner tried to stop me I would kick her ass just for good measure!!!

but no! THQ/WWE took way my ability to get retribution! The tag line for SVR11 is
 "This is Your Moment" Um..Excuse me, THQ? you seem to have removed my ability to create "Moments" um can I have it back please? it would be nice if I could do that like everyone else.      

For a video game that purports to give the player ultimate control over their creations and the in game Universe it does a terrible job of it especially when it comes to female characters.  Like I said Women created or otherwise should be able to compete in any match type no matter what it is and should be able to compete against
whoever the player chooses, be it another Diva or a Superstar/Created Character or other wise.

Here is the Single greatest example of how Mix Tags are when you play online or in general. 

---------

A male Player said this to me:

"I agree with this 110%. I made a, Lita CAW on SvR '10, but realized what was the point in that? I couldn't have her get her revenge on, Cryme Tyme in create a story. besides a fatal four way with, Lita vs Trish Stratus vs Natalya vs Mickie James there was really no point in creating her, If I can't have her fight who I want."

----------------

I fully agree with what he said.

also Mixed Tags are used in Ranked matches mainly by cheaters for stats boosting
Noob/Cheater will make a Mixed Tag just so they can pick a Diva and run into
the ring and get hit on purpose so they can pick up an easy win. 

So you see THQ making it were "hitting a girl" is a DQ-able offense actually
backfired where people are getting suckered into this and now they have a DQ
penalty on them that is taking away their points at the end of the match
which is making them not very happy.. yeah great system you have in place there
THQ absolutely brilliant! 


More complaints From Female Players:

"Thq's excuse as to not putting our match (6 Diva Tag) in the game, and blaming it on polygons no less. While that may be a good answer, its not for me. So maybe their are some tech hurdles and issues they have their and they may be seriously telling us the truth. Here's my problem and why i think that excuse is a bunch of BS personified.

For one they say that they hear us right? they understand why us diva fans are complaining and they promise justice will be served. Its been 2 going on 3 years now since we been complaining about that match going back in since they took it out. WWE 12 is around the corner and they have done exactly nothing since they said that. You guys can defend that statement on your tech hurdles and even say "their focus is core gameplay this year" ok that's some good bull shit i wont buy any of it but that's good bull shit.... explain why we didn't have this last year in 2011? And then whatever you have to say as to why we didn't have last year disregarding people glitching the match online explain why we didn't have it in 2010. There's my problem, we have to wait till WWE 13, Raw 13, wrestling 101, 2013 or whatever the hell they wanna call it next year, and then again its not promised next year, and the way Corey was talking about it he didn't seem to interested on working on it either.

Here's the thing,and to why i wont buy or listen to their excuses, its a simple fact that i would never complain for a feature or match type that's never been in the game before, if we never had this then yes i would still complain about them getting it in the game but i wouldn't stress it or make a big deal i would just say its another THQ fail to give us the game we want. but since it has been in the game before, for whatever reason they took it out why is it so hard to put back in. You can't say its slow cause all the games are slow my 2011 character select is slow and the menus following it, not to mention online glitchers who made the match seemed to work just fine. you say its tech hurdles but a glitcher just glitched your crap and made it happen yet THQ can't yeah that's reasonable. also guys can do these matches just fine even though they have their beards and some of them have long hair HBK,Taker,Morrison,etc

I can't buy in to the tech excuse because I don't see why their playing it off. Now i understand it is a guys game so of course superstars will get the most attention to satisfy the guy audience, i don't care if they get more stuff than the diva's i'm not complaining about them having more features. they clearly show that their putting more effort into other things but they can't give one diva match the same amount of attention they do to other modes and features. its been 2 going on 3 years now, whats the hold up on diva matches cause now its looking to be 4 years now since we won't get it this year again. they should have had any bug or tech hurdle issues fixed by now. if a minor issue like that came up in the other match ups i bet they get fixed before next years game, they say this year they fixed online stuff....congrats good job on that, you fix that the next year you see people angry about it, yet you ignore your diva fans... that's fair."


They have a point I do agree with them and they go on to say: 


"I won't buy in any excuse they give me because of that, theirs no excuse, at this point i really want to know whats the real reason cause this is just something i gotta know. If i was that nerd corey here is how i would go about it. I see i have to focus on this and that and yeah people been complaining about this. I see my male audience wants certain stuff, showing favortism is ok if you get both audiences satsified (diva's should be prioty since we been complaining for 2 years going on 3) i would show both sides equal amount of my time and seeing how the guys get what they want and divas don't.. shows you what they think. They have the time to perfect ortons beard yet they can't give us a match and we get the exact same crap from last year on top of that, thats just awsome makes me jump for joy -_- "  (note the sarcasm)


Once again I fully agree and so does this person below:

"Their is no excuse at all, just as Ashley said. I can believe that cause clearly they don't care even though its supposed to be "our time now" "our universe" they need to stop saying that cause its not our time now "its THQ'S time now" when you completely ignore an audience for over 3 years you know they just messed up. they can fix every other bug and all that yet they seem to can't get this one match that they did before, doesn't make sense to me at all.

I loved the game so much, its not cause of gameplay i could really careless, they can bring back 2006 gameplay and wouldnt hurt me one bit. I loved the game strictly for CAWS and creation. however if the diva's weren't in the game i wouldnt get it, i wouldnt rent it, it would be pointless. Yes i play with the guys too just so you know but i favor the divas of course and play with them the most, all my caws are diva's except for 1 male and that male is made for achievements only and thats it. No diva's means no diva caws which mean they take away my reason of buying the game. When the game first comes out and i would do it every year, i edit my roster and make sure everything right,clean or dirty,etc and then caw creation, i have them all on paper in alphabhetical order, dirty or clean and their brand so i make them all at once then i give them movesets as well as fix the existing superstars/diva's move sets then i do entrances and exisiting superstars and divas too. then i go into playing the game, so i spend a week creating. Even though there is alot of negitives I try to enjoy the game every year, but let me tell you this issue on six diva's tag better see some light cause pretty soon i might just stick to my other games and leave the wrestling on tv, cause clearly i dont need to keep playing something where the developers dont care about a certain part of their fans.

  Ive seen other company's making bad decisions before, Microsoft completely failed their E3 show case, the only good thing they showed was gears 3 and that's it. they spend literally almost an hour talking about Kinect, when you talking about making bad decisions, this defines it, they have it where if you want to go to Disney land ... Kinect. you wanna see Elmo and all the little kids and Disney stuff your Xbox supports that now...you gotta be kidding me. another company Square Enix in my mind the best company ever (since i love rpgs) even i admit they been messing up lately, they failed in so much stuff. so why do i continue to support 360 even though i have a ps3, they have other stuff that keeps me interested in their stuff, Square Enix been messing up but I'm still with them cause they have other things such as FFXIII -2 keeps me interested and it has what i want. THQ is making a bad decisions with their diva fans, something or somebody needs to get handled soon cause right now creation is the only thing that's keeping me their, put that six diva match in their and i'm satisfied.

So ask yourself, really do they really have a good excuse to be ignoring something this big which is driving people away from their stuff, which will drop them in sales....really just think about it and tell me I'm wrong for not buying that polygon crap."

And the debate continues with others saying:

"Ive heard both sides and i have to agree with what raekon is saying after all us and double h both came up with it together. its true their could be some other reason with the tech stuff this year, but as I said doesn't explain why last year and the year before that. They promise we will get this and do nothing at all the following year and now they give us the same crap this year.

They shouldn't keep asking us for what we want in the game if their not going to deliver.

Ive heard their crap for 3 years now and i see that their is no explanation as to why? look at everything we talked about, theirs no possible excuse at all. people hack their system and bypass their supposed crap that they call tech hurdles and such yet they can't do it but hackers can.

You want evidence its staring you in the face, THQ favors other stuff which i don't blame them but they could at least show equal time for the divas as well. They don't care about the divas, they don't care about their diva fans regardless how much Corey says he hears us. They care more about getting beards in most peoples words, I think they care more about their stupid belt sizes and caw limits than anything else. They give us a feature for create modes just so we can keep buying their product. You guy's are blind if you can't understand whats being shown in front of you.

I brought up 2011 and 2010 to state my case that they have been telling us they would fix for those years, 2010 showed nothing they said, 2011 we got nothing again. we should be looking at the future which is WWE 12? your right I'm looking at the future and seeing how we still get nothing again this year that future is looking kind dull and repeated time again and again.

Once again tech issues, that's all everybody says is tech issues, whats so different about their tech issues that they haven't fixed yet huh? whatever tech issues they have for 6 man tag match where fixed right away, online glitching they fixed that right up, they fix up everything else except something that involves a diva, conspiracy against their diva fans, I'm not just blaming THQ I'm blaming WWE they favor other modes and fancy beards...hell i care more about john Morrison's than Orton's and i don't see anybody talking about that. They can keep saying tech issues but the guys have equal features like the diva's yet its not a problem or it gets fixed yet 3 years on our match and they still come up with lame excuses."

 So there you have it people are upset, people are angry,  people are let down and feel as though
the people in charge don't give a damn about that  and I am one of those people..

Think the games are awesome? think they're great?
I and many other people are being held back due to our gender
being held back because of bureaucracy
being held back to "protect us"
being held back for our own good
being held back becasue of "false" technical issues.
being held back due to old outdated ideas
being held back becasue we aren't considerd important
In short I and many others are just simply being held back..
I am being held back from enjoying a product the way I want to as it is keeping 

me from my friends.from enjoying it the way as everyone else does. 

The game has to return to being made with fairness on both sides. You shouldn't put all the 
efforts in to just one side of the game  It has to be done equally the male characters would get just as much development and attention as the female characters.  there would not be a special set of rules governing  one side and not the other, there should be no limitations placed on one side and not the other. 

If the men can take part in any listed match type being it ladder, extreme, Hell in a Cell or 6 Man tag, then it would be only fair that the women could do that as well.. women would be allowed to take part in any and all listed match type being it ladder, extreme, Hell in a Cell or 6 Man tag.  Fair and equal on both sides.  Also it should be brought back to were it would support Gender Neutral game play female and male characters can compete against each other in any listed match  be it online or offline.  The goal of this should be you would want people to play together and have fun and interesting match-up regardless of the gender of the player and their character.

For those who believe that
Gender Neutral game play is a morally reprehensible issue then they would have the ability to turn this feature off, Also by turning this feature off you will be prompted for a password.  Once password is in place the ability to take part in the male vs female match types will be disabled.  Because of course we have to think of the children http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ThinkOfTheChildren

or instead of turning off the feature and being prompted for a Password the
game ships with the feature already locked and in the case you get a DLC style card
with a password on it that turns off the Gender Restrictions and gives you that
3rd "anyone" option.People who don't want to use it don't have to, and they can
continue play the way they want to and everyone is happy.

Or still yet again, game ships with the feature already locked
and you have to go on PS Store and purchase an update for say
$3.99-5.99 that will unlock it and turns off the Gender Restrictions
and gives you that 3rd "anyone" option.
People who don't want to use it don't have to, and they can
continue play the way they want to and everyone is happy.
there is many things you could do, with out really changing anything.. 

But in the End fairness, equality and fun should be a main priority.

Friday, July 29, 2011

Who's to Blame?

I didn't truly know what to call this post, but I think
that title is very appropriate becasue that is what people
do they look for something or someone to blame, instead
to being accountable for their own actions.

Now this post came about when I posted a comment about
WWE12 that made me look like a crazy bitch on the SVR.com
page.  Now I was trying many times to have a serious
discussion on there at times, but I don't know I think
alot of the time people mostly Men are incapable of having a serious
discussion especially on online.

 So I seen guys put up crazy rant posts and be taken
seriously so that is what I decided to do. 
 and it was met with many levels of negativity and
hostility especially from one User by the name of
KurenaiOD  who told me if I wanted to engage the board
in a serious discussion I should come up with a serious argument
and not just makes crazy posts and statements.

I then sent him a Private Message (PM) to tell him that
is what I was trying to do before but no one would take
me seriously and that message would result in a
intelligent conversation which is posted below
on "Who's to blame" 

(side note I go by DisapointedDiva on
that website were the below messages are from becasue
I'm disappointed in the game)

-------------
Participants: KurenaiOD and DisapointedDiva
DisapointedDiva
06/15/2011 - 6:16pm

Original serious argument: 


but like I said if people are going to be dicks to me  when I'm trying to stand up
for what I believe in then I'm going to be a crazy bitch  becasue that is the only
way they understand things.   whenever I meet someone online who just wants to
be an Asshole for the sake for being an Asshole  it kind of reminds me of that line
from the Dark Knight

Alfred Pennyworth: Because he thought it was good sport. Because some men 
aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, 
reasoned or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

and its the same on the internet some people on here don't care about the game, or
its production or what goes into it and some probably have never played it any of them.
All they want to do is cause an upset.

you would say "I would like them to put such and such back in"  and people will agree
with you  but those hand full of people will disagree with you no matter what it is.  they
just disagree becasue they think its funny.  they might actually want the thing also but they
will disagree for the sake of disagreeing.

KurenaiOD
06/15/2011 - 7:48pm

That is very true, that's the sort of argument I prefer to read not the whole
"being a crazy bitch" thing, yes sometimes people only understand that sort of act
but at the same time a lot of arseholes are playing to get you acting that way.

By throwing a wobbly you provoke arrogance and arsehole behavior from them,
being mature, they just look like stupid morons who can't string words together.
Brains in debate will always outweigh heavy words, especially heavy words created by such a brain.

I was wrong about you basing my opinion on that first outspoken post, you clearly do
have a good head on your shoulders, so I apologize if anything I said insulted you initially,
I just can't stand pussy complaining since I am so used to more constructive and intelligent
discussion... also due to the hoohaa it causes on the forum where there are so many egotisical
gits on here.

DisapointedDiva
06/15/2011 - 11:04pm

Well that's true and that is the original argument that is always talked about. but even when I leaded with that people give me crap over it.  consistently just like heaping it on.  to the point where you have to strike out at some times.   and yes like I said i tried to have more constructive and intelligent discussion which I have had with alot of people through the message function but when you try to do it in a general discussion mode  I just have assclowns and jerkstores  all over me.  telling me I'm crazy and an idiot and just cursing me out.

But like I said I have research, facts and figures my opinions, other peoples opinions, and actual quote from a reporter from an actual serious wrestling site, stuff that contradicts what WWE says.  having them not care what I said after THQ told me "its not our problem"  I didn't half ass this.   "Brains in debate will always outweigh heavy words"  thats not always true people will always be like the horse from Ren & Stimpy and be all "No Sir, I Don't Like It"  and alot of the times they do it just to be jerks. 

Also people like to get up on their moral high horse  but  like I told that mike guy  "You can have all the moral authority in the world, but being on the “right” side doesn’t mean being right."

and well like I said I don't complain if there is nothing to complain about, I'm not that type of person but this is worth complaining about becasue it is unfair to a great majority of players.  That is why I'm mad with pretty much the whole thing  is as far as the women are concerned they are two faced and hypercritical  they say one thing and do another.

Also that's why I came up with the idea of making it a option as well as having an on/off switch.   if you can turn on/off the blood why not this?    There are many ways you can argue this  but in the end it just seems futile..

and do you know what hurts me,  the number 1 thing right now that everyone is concerned about isn't this..it isn't game play or move set  the number one thing people care about in WWE12 is whether Randy Orton will have a beard or not...that's your WWE Universe..

KurenaiOD
06/15/2011 - 11:09pm

To be honest this actually came up a while back, I suggested an optional thing too with being able to turn off inter-gender etc.  I brought up sexism and how the female gamers were getting a raw deal, it's somewhere in the old SvR 2011 threads, it was called something along the lines of "Do WWE intentionally paint the picture that women are weak or is it WWE?", can't remember the title exactly but it may show up in the search.

I agree with you in the sensible wording you put it down as, as did I agree with your following points.

Oh and please don't get me started I've left enough sarcastic posts in that stupid beard thread XD  It's true that is one of the stupid things people are concerned about.

DisapointedDiva
06/18/2011 - 6:08pm

Well I didn't know that it came up awhile ago  as people seem to like to point out I haven't been here very long, not that it matters.  Also yes that would be the best idea to do, is to make it a choose-able thing.  Not remove it completely for fear that some mother somewhere in the world will start a shit storm and blame WWE becasue lil Jimmy punched his sister. 

I don't know if you have kids, but have you ever watched kids play?  I don't have any at lease not yet,  but a friend of mine has a son he is 9 going on 10 and like most lil boys he has quite a few action figures. Now I have watched him playing he'd have his ring set up and have Mickie James Fighting Triple H.   Triple H would punch her out and in comes Beth who kicks him in the head and when Triple H goes down Cena jumps in clotheslines  Beth, then Mickie who has gotten up comes off the top rope and cross bodies Cena and it goes on and on like that...  Kids don't discriminate..Kids are taught to discriminate.

Now true someone could say that is a tell tale sign that he will grow up to be an abuser..   How does that work he is just a lil boy playing with his toys on the living room carpet..   Now if someone were to come in there and tell him "oh you can't play like that,  The women characters can't be in the ring with the male characters"   he would probably look at you like you have 2 heads..   and it would bring up the question of  "what right do you have to tell him how to play"  that stifles his creativity, his imagination and he will feel like he is doing something wrong and it will as you put it "intentionally paint the picture that women are weak"  and that is just wrong. 

Now like I said I don't support or condone violence towards women "in real life" like where you hear about some guy stabling his girlfriend on the news that's not cool. but on the other side of it were talking about stuff that isn't real.  your not really beating up real people on the Smackdown VS.Raw games. true you could say  the Undertaker is real,  but not in the game it is a visual representation of someone, its a computer model, its an Avatar.   having a computer generated Stone Cold Steve Austin fighting it out with a computer generated Trish Stratus is not going to hurt anyone.  but sure according to watchdog groups, it will. I don't see how but it will with their made up stats and moral righteousness.

But thanks for agreeing with my points and when putting it down I wanted to be precise and truthful there is no made up stuff in my blog posting it can all be back up with source links and videos I provided.   I wasn't going to say something with out having some evidence of what I was saying was factual

I know the whole beard thing is rather stupid  I posted my quote on other places

"do you know what hurts me,  the number 1 thing right now that everyone is concerned about isn't this (Diva Restrictions and discrimination)..it isn't game play or move set  the number one thing people care about in WWE12 is whether Randy Orton will have a beard or not...that's your WWE Universe.."

out of all the weighty more important things we could be talking about concerning the game this is the number one thing people are worried about?  but I guess this place is no different from any other all the serious threads get lost in the crap post post.

KurenaiOD
06/18/2011 - 9:21pm

Yeah I know, to be totally honest for the most part I don't buy the "Games make kids into violent killers" bullcrap, it's parenting, if the parents were spending time with their kids and watching them properly and not buying overrated age games for them they would be doing them a favor.  Too often films and games become excuses for bad parents, that seems to be the case for the most part.

I remember a killing here in the UK where a kid stabbed someone with a screwdriver in the neck and the mum went on and blamed Manhunt... totally missing the fact that the game was 18 rated and the boy who drivered the other was 14... so that bit her on the arse because she actually willingly bought the game.  If the game is to blame then surely the mother is the murder?  But no of course not it's the games fault not hers at all, blame the game, restrict on developers creativity because you are a bad parent.  Being a games design student it's something the pisses me off since we get hit with restrictions when some idiot parent buys a game they shouldn't lol.

That Phinneus guy is getting all lordy with his opinion again, lol accusing me of attacking him when I voiced my opinion, if he gets that irritated by me saying something against him, that means he's attacked every post I've ever made lol.  Ah well he'll go away eventually, he attacked me ages go over a CAW when I voiced my opinion about not liking it lol.

   
DisapointedDiva
06/21/2011 - 11:45pm

I totally agree, now I don't play or support the shooter games.
I don't have a problem with FPS in general if your some Space Marine
in the year 3035 shooting Aliens or robots that's all well and good.
but if your in present day and everything is realistic like how it actually
is in an actual combat situation then that is a bit to much.
Also I don't think games like this send a good message becasue you
could be doing  "Mission Pack: Iraq" and you go and start shooting
Iraqis. is that a good message to put out there?  not really becasue
pretty soon anyone with darker skin becomes "the enemy".
Now I know that might sound hypocritical being for one thing and
not the other but then again it is all a point of view.

 But I do agree with you also, It is parenting and yes alot of
it is the parents are "too busy"  and rely on this stuff to much
when they should be spending time with their kids and actually
paying attention to what types of media they consume. One of the
arguments I bring up is the games are rated T for Teen.
if the kid is like 8 years old he shouldn't be playing
the game to begin with becasue I missed the announcement were
being 8 made you a Teen.

 also people complained and complained and a ratings board was
put into to place and where did that get us? No where..becasue
no one pays attention to it.. Also people might say well Shooters
are rated M so only people over 17 can buy them.  and I would say
are you serious? people under the age of 17 are going to play
this no matter the rating. trust me on this.

  I know becasue I work retail. I work at my friends
collectables shop and we sell games there and I have had
8-10 year olds try to by M rated games and I have to be all
"sorry hon you're not old enough"  and they would leave and
no more then 3-5mins an adult walks in and buys that exact
same thing and who is this? it was probably their mom or
dad waiting in the car outside. So being that this is an
adult I have no problem selling it to them.
and after a few hours to the next day I had that same
person come back and throw a fit about how I could sell
this to their child and all that speel and I tell them I
didn't sell it to their child I told your child No and
and they went out and complained to you and then you
came in and bought it for them and gave it to them.

So of course they don't like that answer and the thing is
returned (open stuff like that are put on the shelf behind
the counter and sold at a discount to make up the money that
had to be refunded)  There were even times when the parent
and the kid were there and I told the parent that this is
rated such and such and they wanted it anyway.. so they have
no right to complain after wards becasue if they don't want
there kids exposed to certain things they shouldn't be buying
the kid the things that will expose them to it.

also that is Bullcrap saying "Games make kids into violent killers"
they will always say that about stuff though.
in the 50s Elvis dancing was only shown from the waist up.
They thought it was too sexual.

There were also stations banning rock and roll music
as it was  the music of the devil.
The same when KISS made its appearance, if you were a
member of the "KISS army" you were in a "satanic cult"
if something is moderately popular "they" as in some group being
it censorship/Religious/parental/Violence against anyone/thing.
will have a problem with it

Everything from body piercings, to dying your hair orange,
to the clothes you wear.and especially when it comes to the media..
apparently...
Porn turns you into a Rapist
Horror movies make you a serial killer
any type of angry music "heavy metal/rap" makes you a
violent killer.
Role Playing games dive you insane
television makes you stupid (hence its called "the Idiot box")
pro wrestling makes you a wife beater
and of course Video Games make kids into violent killers.
and it goes on and on and it will always be that way..

Take the internet for example everyone loves the internet especially
me but when the internet started gaining popularly suddenly
people were saying that it will infect your home, break
up your family and corrupt your kids while at the same time
stealing every dime you have or ever will have..
20 years from now people are going to say "HoloDecks
cause VR addiction and insanity when the player can no
longer tell fiction from reality"  so that will always be there.

 Its funny that we're complaining about an American thing being
that you're in the UK and I'm from Canada. but isn't that always
the way..
well yeah I agree to some extent that she should be at fault.
she purchased the game and if there is a scene like that in there
(I never played Man Hunt) you could argue that, that is where he had
gotten the idea from, but then you can pretty much kill anyone with
just about anything..but still if the game was rated 18+ and he was
14, then like I said above he shouldn't have been playing it in the first
place. so yes some blame should go on her. 
I call it "finger pointing" because they point the finger at
what they perceive to be the cause of the problem.  Take the
Columbine shooting as an example they blamed that in part
on video games such as Doom and Wolfenstein 3D.

Many lawsuits against video game manufacturers were filed as
a result by parents of some of the victims.
But not only were games like this blamed but the main blame the one
person they held responsible for this was Marilyn Manson..
here you can see his reaction to being blamed for it


 I think he has an excellent point, I'm not a fan of his I like
maybe 3 songs of his but still he does make excellent points
you can also read the article that was written in Rolling Stone
by Manson here: http://www.antilife.org/files/marilyn.html
I fully agree that goes back to what I was saying with
the Gender restrictions and if you ever notice I am not
promoting Male violence against Women, I always
refer to it as Diva V.s Superstars and People get bent
out of shape.  also to restrict developers creativity
is not something they should do  people who complain forget that:

A. The average game player is 37 years old and has been playing
games for 12 years.

B. The average age of the most frequent game purchaser
is 41 years old.

C. In 2011, 29 percent of Americans over the age of 50 play
video games, an increase from nine percent in 1999.

D. Parents are present when games are purchased or rented 91
percent of the time.

(this information can be found here: http://www.theesa.com/facts/index.asp)

I deal in fact and figures, also the time of lil kids being the number one players
is gone and by making everything kid friendly it is hurting the industry as a whole.
The main game players are adults and the entertainment should grow with them but
true if they refuse to heed the ratings on the games and some idiot
parent buys a game they shouldn't and gives it to their child
and then complains about the violence in it it is their own fault.
Its not the games fault that piece of "Media" was produced for persons
over 18+ and not for a 9, 13 or 15 year old.

 "Facts, common sense and numerous studies all debunk the myth
that there is a link between computer and video games and violence.


Blaming video games for violence in the real world is
no more productive than blaming the news media for bringing
crimes of violence into our homes night after night.  Having
someone or something to blame is convenient, especially after an
incident of terrible and unexplainable violence.  But to do so is
simplistic, and more importantly, it's wrong."
(quote from here:  http://www.theesa.com/facts/violence.asp)

The reason I used that quote is that I'm constantly told
"Blame Chris Benoit for the Gender Restrictions. It is his fault!" 
Now I'm not going to do that and here is the problem with people
saying that. Here is what I told people who kept hammering away
with that excuse.

"Now here is the thing about the Chris Benoit excuse.
Now true it was a horrible thing that happened.
and it took place on June 25 2007  now SVR2008 was released
November 13, 2007 that is 4 months, 19 days after what happen
to Benoit.  
Sure they removed all thing related to Benoit from SVR08  
but if Female VS. Male was such a hot button thing at that
time then why wasn't that removed? they had over 4 Months to do it.
  Then along came SVR09 which was released November 9, 2008
that's 1 year, 4 months, 16 days after the events of what
happened to  Benoit. Then finally SVR2010 came out on
October 20, 2009  and at that point it had been 2 years, 3 months, 26 days 
since the Benoit thing.
If the Female VS. Male thing was such a hot button issue becasue
of the tragedy of Benoit.  wouldn't you think that it would have been 
removed before SVR2008  was released?
I would think so!  I wouldn't wait over 2 years to remove a
problem.  that is why the "Benoit excuse"  doesn't work  especially
for me  becasue it doesn't make sense."
(releases dates are for North America)

No you can't blame it on him and what he did but of course
that is just one of the excuses I heard that most people cling to.
I think I made this long enough I might actually take
this and make it a blog post. Also don't worry about what people
say on the boards they are fixed into one opinion and will not change
it for anyone no matter what you say or do.
and if your opinion doesn't match theirs they'll take offense
to that.  Like the Benoit thing above when I posted that people
flipped out they don't like be showed up and someone telling them the
truth
----------------------

  As you can see I did make it a blog post. 
but it is true, you can't blame the Media for anything.

If that were the case then you could blame WWE for plenty.

for example on the July 11th 2011 episode of RAW Vince called CM Punk
a son of a bitch.  Now I do agree with what CM Punk said Vince is
probably the one of the biggest Hypocrites and do agree with alot of what
CM Punk had said. Also having good 'ol Stone Cold Steve Austin
running around calling every one with in ear shot a "sonovabitch"
Also here is Stone Cold Steve Austin flipping people off on  RAW 3/7/2011
(wait until the slider gets to 56 secs) he of course keeps doing
it as always and you can clearly see it again at 2:12 on the slider

That is not very kid or family friendly? I guess the WWE doesn't know of the old saying
"Bad language makes for Bad feelings"


 Also regarding Stone Cold, you could blame WWE for alcoholism
all those years right up to recently where Stone Cold would come out
and downing "Steveweisers"

A kid could see that and think that drinking makes him cool and/or tough and take it up.
He could start drinking at an early age become an alcoholic and end up suffer from
Chronic pancreatiti, liver disease and quite possibility Cancer.

He could get drunk and start fights and serious hurt people or himself get hurt,
He could be drunk and get behind the wheel of a car and cause a serious accident
where you would hear on the news that he was a fan of WWE and more importantly 
the hard drinking personality know as Stone Cold Steve Austin
"many family and friends said he took up drink because his hero did"

  Also this guy could get drunk and hit his girlfriend/wife 
with out the benefit of video games. (becasue apparently
Inter-gender violence in video games turns men into women
beaters or so I'm told)
Some weeks ago on RAW John Cena took part in drinking with
Stone Cold

Now kids look up to Cena and what type of example is this
sending to them?
Also I have to laugh at John Cena and the WWE.   He is no longer allowed to do
the "STFU"  its just a "STF" now, along with the "FU" which is now an
"Attitude Adjustment"  but the thing that makes me giggle all the time is
his "5 Knuckle Shuffle"   am I the only one who knows that this name is
another term for masturbation?  As in a guy jerking off..
I don't know if the WWE or John Cena know this?  but it makes me
laugh ever time!  


  I was talking to a friend of mine, the other day about this topic and we had to have a
laugh becasue the blaming of video games for all of societies problems happened before,
but not with video games.. but with another popular medium the Comic Book.  

Back in the 1940's and 1950's of the comic book censorship crusade,
refereed to by many as the "Seduction of the Innocent" which is
biased on a book of the same name which was created out of the
apparent findings and the works of Dr. Fredric Wertham.


"Seduction of the Innocent is a book by German-American psychiatrist
Fredric Wertham, published in 1954, that warned that comic books were
a negative form of popular literature and a serious cause of juvenile
delinquency. The book was a minor bestseller that created alarm in parents
and galvanized them to campaign for censorship. At the same time, a U.S.
Congressional inquiry was launched into the comic book industry. Subsequent
to the publication of Seduction of the Innocent, the Comics Code Authority
was voluntarily established by publishers to self-censor their titles."
 (Quote from  Wikipedia)

 In this book it made many wild claims that comics promoted
juvenile delinquency,violence, sex, drug use and also made
outrageous clams that Characters such as Batman and Robin were gay lovers,
Wonder Woman's strength and independence made her a lesbian and
 Superman was Un-American and was a fascist. 

Wertham even gave testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile
Delinquency restating arguments from his book and pointed to comics as a
major cause of juvenile crime.

With parental complaints and a governmental ruling handed down
which did not blame comics for crime, but recommended that the comics
industry tone down under the threat of potential censorship.
The comics code was created. 

In the documentary film Comic Books Unbound, Stan Lee and other industry
figures state that the book caused comic book sales to plunge as well as
lead to mass public burnings of comics.

Lucky as of the 2000s the comics code is no longer in use

 Why is this important in a topic about Video Games?
becasue pretty much the same thing happened to Video games.

In the early to mid 90s  After the release of games such as
Mortal Kombat, Doom, ect. there was much controversy over video game
content. Hearings on video game violence and the corruption of society
took place. (sound familiar?) and the cycle started all over again...
The Hearings headed by Joe Lieberman and Herb Kohl were held in late
1992 to 1993. The result of the hearings was that the entertainment
software industry was given one year to form a working rating system
or the federal government would intervene and create its own system.
(again governmental threats, much like the Comic Industry faced)

Around this time, the Video game Rating Council (VRC)
was formed by Sega of America to rate mostly its own games as other
publishers did the same.  It wasn't until On July 29, 1994 the proposal
from the IDSA for a rating system, the Entertainment Software Rating
Board (ESRB) was presented in Congress and approved. In September 1994,
the ESRB was established and became the de facto rater of video games in
the United States.

But like I said before...what good is a ratings board if very few
pay attention to it? 

Now in closing
take this shooting in Norway..  It is a terrible thing that happened but
did you know 9 times out of ten  the first question that is asked is
did the shooter play video games?  why do they ask this? for sensationalism
and like I said they need something to blame.. 
I haven't really been following the story, but the guy could have had a
great deal of mental problems, but that wouldn't matter if he played video games
becasue of course then the "Media" would have something to point the finger at
and say "AH HA! see! the video games drove him to do it"  even if there is no evidence
that he remotely played any video games  you mention video game in the same
breath as this tragedy and people will jump all over it.

 Now  it has been made clear that the Shooter (know as Anders Behring Breivik)
had claimed to have used Modern Warfare 2 as a "Training tool" 
the article I read this in is from PC World and can be found here:
 PCWorld Article
the most important part I think of this article is as follows

Matt Peckham, PCWorld:


as for Modern Warfare 2's mention as a "training tool," what of it? 
If your aim's to shoot accurately, shooting ranges are certainly also 
training tools. So are BB guns, bows, pellet guns (and even, to a lesser 
extent, water pistols and rifles). 
Flight simulators have been located on computers found at suspected 
Al Qaeda training bases. Should we ban shooting ranges, BB and pellet 
guns, archery, and flight simulators because some nutjob goes ballistic, 
then cites a video game as a "training tool" in a 1,500-page assemblage 
of philosophical mumbo-jumbo? 
Simply because of the potential for indirect misuse?


Of course not. There's no causal link here. All we have is another 
aberrant who's done something shocking but, it's worth bearing in mind, 
exceedingly rare; someone who allegedly chose to use widely available 
technology as a savage means to his own twisted political ends."

-------------------------------------

The above quote is like what I said before in the original Blog post:
"Now If a guy is sick and simply wants to beat up women for no
reason that's HIS problem. He will find a way to do sick things otherwise!
I for one want to  boot up a game,Play as my character and have a knockdown
drag out fight with the Undertaker, why?  becasue that is fun
what would you rather do have a knock down drag out fight
3 stages of hell or Hell in a Cell with the Undertaker or
a singles match with Beth Phoenix for the 15th million time"

The game is not telling you to go beat up women, Nor is
WWE or THQ, NOBODY is telling you to do that it is just
a game meant for fun and is sadly taken to serious my most
people.

 If  a game like SVR (WWE'12) and others like it such as
Tekken, Mortal Kombat, Street Fighter is to blame for Domestic
as well as Inter-Gender violence then a game like Tomb Raider
can be blamed for promoting animal cruelty and you don't
see Peta storming the offices of Core Design or Crystal Dynamics

becasue Lara is shooting some wolves, bats and Dinosaurs.

  Now even as much as people would like to
think there is proof ... in the end there is no hard evidence that
media violence creates real world violence.